In Union County, South Carolina, the cotton mills that once sustained the economy and offered jobs have vanished over time. Today, this area is designated as a “food desert,” indicating that numerous inhabitants reside a considerable distance from the nearest supermarket. Observing this problem, community non-profit leader Elise Ashby initiated a project in 2016. She partnered with local farmers to deliver affordable boxes of fresh fruit and vegetables across the county, which has a demographic where nearly 30% of the population is Black and approximately 25% are living below the poverty line.
At first, Ms. Ashby financed the project using her own savings and minor grants. But in 2023, her work gained substantial support as the Walmart Foundation—the charitable arm of one of the country’s largest companies—awarded her organization more than $100,000 (£80,000). This funding was included in a larger $1.5 million initiative designed to assist “community-based non-profits led by people of color.”
“It brought me to tears,” she confessed. “It was one of those instances when you understand that someone genuinely recognizes and appreciates your efforts.”
A mere two years ago, initiatives like this received extensive support from large companies throughout the U.S., as the nation confronted systemic racism following the 2020 murder of George Floyd, a Black man who lost his life beneath the knee of a Minneapolis police officer.
However, many of these corporations are now retreating from such commitments. In November, Walmart announced the discontinuation of some diversity initiatives, including plans to shut down its Center for Racial Equity, which had been instrumental in funding Ms. Ashby’s grant.
Companies such as Meta, Google, Goldman Sachs, and McDonald’s have all made similar moves, reflecting a broader corporate pullback from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.
This transition signifies a significant cultural shift, partly fueled by concerns over potential legal issues, regulatory examination, and negative reactions on social media—pressures intensified by the current U.S. president.
Since taking office in January, Donald Trump has actively sought to dismantle DEI programs, pushing for a shift back to “merit-based opportunity” in the U.S. He has directed the federal government to eliminate DEI initiatives and begin investigations into private companies and academic institutions suspected of “illegal DEI practices.”
During the initial months of his second term, the Department of Veterans Affairs shut down its DEI offices, the Environmental Protection Agency put nearly 200 civil rights staff on paid leave, and Trump ousted the nation’s top military general—a Black individual—after the defense secretary had earlier recommended his removal because of his connection to “woke” DEI strategies.
At first glance, it might appear that the U.S. has given up on improving outcomes for historically marginalized racial and identity groups. Yet, some experts propose that these programs may continue, though perhaps rebranded to match the evolving political environment of a country that has recently chosen a leader focused on contesting “woke” policies.
The Roots of the Backlash
DEI-style programs first gained momentum in the U.S. during the 1960s in response to the civil rights movement, which sought to expand and protect the rights of Black Americans.
Originally termed as “affirmative action” and “equal opportunity,” these initiatives were designed to address the enduring effects of slavery and the institutionalized discrimination imposed by Jim Crow laws.
As social justice movements evolved to encompass women’s rights, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and racial and ethnic diversity, the terminology surrounding these efforts broadened to include “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion.”
Within businesses and government institutions, DEI efforts primarily targeted hiring strategies that portrayed diversity as a financial benefit. Supporters contend that these programs tackle inequalities across different communities, though a significant focus has traditionally been on racial equity.
The drive for DEI escalated in 2020 during the Black Lives Matter demonstrations and rising calls for societal change. For example, Walmart committed $100 million over five years to create its Center for Racial Equity. Wells Fargo named its first chief diversity officer, while firms like Google and Nike already had similar positions established. As a result of these developments, S&P 100 companies generated over 300,000 new jobs, with 94% of them awarded to people of color, per Bloomberg.
Nonetheless, as rapidly as these initiatives grew, a conservative backlash arose.
Stefan Padfield, executive director of the conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research, argues that DEI programs fundamentally divide people along racial and gender lines.
In recent times, critics have amplified claims that DEI efforts—initially intended to fight discrimination—are themselves discriminatory, especially against white Americans. Training workshops that emphasize “white privilege” and systemic racial bias have faced significant criticism.
The basis of this opposition originates from conservative pushback against critical race theory (CRT), an academic model proposing that racism is deeply ingrained in American society. Over time, campaigns against CRT in educational institutions evolved into wider attempts to target “woke corporations.”
Online platforms like End Wokeness and conservative personalities such as Robby Starbuck have leveraged this feeling, directing attention to companies for their DEI efforts. Starbuck has taken credit for changes in policy at firms like Ford, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson after revealing their DEI programs to his audience on social media.
One prominent success for this movement occurred in spring 2023, when Bud Light encountered significant backlash for collaborating with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Boycott calls targeting the brand and its parent firm, Anheuser-Busch, led to a 28% drop in Bud Light sales, according to an analysis by Harvard Business Review.
Another major turning point arrived in June 2023, when the Supreme Court ruled that race could no longer be a factor in university admissions, effectively dismantling decades of affirmative action policies.
This decision raised questions about the legal foundation of corporate DEI policies. After the ruling, Meta advised employees that “the legal and policy landscape surrounding DEI has shifted,” shortly before revealing the termination of its own DEI programs.
Corporate Withdrawal: A Matter of Authenticity
The swift reversal of DEI programs by major corporations prompts questions about the genuineness of their pledges to workforce diversity.
Martin Whittaker, CEO of JUST Capital—a non-profit that surveys Americans on workplace issues—believes that many firms initially adopted DEI efforts to “appear favorable” following the Black Lives Matter movement, rather than from a true dedication to change.
Nonetheless, not every company is succumbing to political and legal pressure. A report by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation remarked that although DEI programs seem to be waning, “nearly all” Fortune 500 companies still incorporate DEI commitments within their official statements. Moreover, Apple shareholders recently voted to uphold the company’s diversity efforts.
Public sentiment on DEI is polarized. A survey by JUST Capital indicates that backing for DEI has decreased, yet support for associated matters—like equitable pay—remains robust. Likewise, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey revealed that a majority (56%) of working adults still perceive workplace DEI initiatives as advantageous.